| Voting fluidity and oral argument on the US Supreme Court EM Ringsmuth, AC Bryan, TR Johnson Political research quarterly 66 (2), 429-440, 2013 | 68 | 2013 |
| The role of emotional language in briefs before the US Supreme Court RC Black, MEK Hall, RJ Owens, EM Ringsmuth Journal of Law and Courts 4 (2), 377-407, 2016 | 65 | 2016 |
| Hear Me Roar: What Provokes Supreme Court Justices to Dissent from the Bench TR Johnson, RC Black, EM Ringsmuth Minn. L. Rev. 93, 1560, 2008 | 53 | 2008 |
| Jeremiad or weapon of words?: the power of emotive language in Supreme Court dissents AC Bryan, EM Ringsmuth Journal of Law and Courts 4 (1), 159-185, 2016 | 52 | 2016 |
| The American public and the room to maneuver: Responsibility attributions and policy efficacy in an era of globalization TT Hellwig, EM Ringsmuth, JR Freeman International Studies Quarterly 52 (4), 855-880, 2008 | 51 | 2008 |
| Oral argument in the time of covid: The chief plays Calvinball T Jacobi, TR Johnson, EM Ringsmuth, M Sag S. Cal. Interdisc. LJ 30, 399, 2020 | 20 | 2020 |
| It's Not Personal: Politics and Policy in Lower Court Confirmation Hearings L Dancey, KR Nelson, EM Ringsmuth University of Michigan Press, 2020 | 16 | 2020 |
| Supreme Court oral arguments and institutional maintenance EM Ringsmuth, TR Johnson American politics research 41 (4), 651-673, 2013 | 14 | 2013 |
| Strict Scrutiny L Dancey, KR Nelson, EM Ringsmuth Judicature 95, 126, 2011 | 9 | 2011 |
| Departures from the court: The political landscape and institutional constraints KR Nelson, EM Ringsmuth American Politics Research 37 (3), 486-507, 2009 | 9 | 2009 |
| Pushing constitutional limits in the US States: Legislative professionalism and judicial review of state laws by the US Supreme Court SM Miller, EM Ringsmuth, JM Little State Politics & Policy Quarterly 15 (4), 476-491, 2015 | 7 | 2015 |
| Voting fluidity throughout the decision-making process on the US Supreme Court EM Ringsmuth Justice System Journal 36 (3), 197-211, 2015 | 7 | 2015 |
| Individual Scrutiny or Politics as Usual? Senatorial Assessment of US District Court Nominees L Dancey, KR Nelson, EM Ringsmuth American Politics Research 42 (5), 784-814, 2014 | 7 | 2014 |
| SCOTUS and COVID: How the Media Reacted to the Livestreaming of Supreme Court Oral Arguments R Houston, TR Johnson, EM Ringsmuth Rowman & Littlefield, 2023 | 6 | 2023 |
| SCOTUS in the time of COVID: The evolution of justice dynamics during Oral arguments EM Ringsmuth, M Sag, TR Johnson, T Jacobi Law & Policy 45 (1), 66-80, 2023 | 6 | 2023 |
| The Impact of Course Structure on Students’ Political Efficacy and Confidence-in-Knowledge in Introduction to American Government JM Jansa, EM Ringsmuth Journal of Political Science Education 18 (4), 455-475, 2022 | 3 | 2022 |
| Invoking Precedent: Discussion of Supreme Court Decisions at Circuit Court Confirmation Hearings L Dancey, K Nelson, EM Ringsmuth, E Solomon American Politics Research 48 (3), 355-364, 2020 | 1 | 2020 |
| Inter-Institutional Dynamics: Assessments of the Supreme Court in a Separation of Powers Context KR Nelson, EM Ringsmuth Political Behavior 35, 357-382, 2013 | 1 | 2013 |
| Asked and Answered: The Senate Judiciary Committee and Judicial Confirmation Hearings L Dancey, K Nelson, E Ringsmuth APSA 2012 Annual Meeting Paper, 2012 | 1 | 2012 |
| Institutional rules and decision making on the US Supreme Court EM Ringsmuth University of Minnesota, 2009 | 1 | 2009 |
Timothy R. JohnsonHorace T. Morse Distinguished Professor of Political Science and Law, University of MinnesotaVerified email at umn.edu
